Why Oracle didn’t buy MySQL
Reading the excellent analysis of Arjen Lentz, founder of MySQL training company Open Query, of what the open-source database leader MySQL is (and isn’t) makes me wish that Oracle would have discovered MySQL as a complement, rather than as a competitor, several years ago.
MySQL’s is the database software of choice for the Web, period. Oracle’s is the database software of choice for the enterprise, period. It’s unclear, as Lentz points out, that this means one is better than the other–and why we need to keep talking about competition between them:
MySQL doesn’t have to be suited to every possible need, and its not suiting certain needs is not a failure.
A knife and a screwdriver are both useful types of tools, but they are not interchangeable, in terms of purpose. You can cut some things with a screwdriver, and you can try to turn a screw with a knife, and sometimes, such uses even make sense–but it can also get rather awkward, break the tool, cut your hand, and so on. It’s not necessarily pretty.
MySQL has a different market from Oracle, and that is why they are not in direct competition. It’s not about low end and high end on a single scale; it’s quite different in many aspects.
Why Oracle didn’t buy MySQL | The Open Road – CNET News
Popularity: 25% [?]